UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Thursday that the plan was “driven by our shared humanitarian stimulus and made possible by Brexit independence” and that Rwanda would “be able to resettle tens of thousands of people” with the help of the UK. In the years to come. “
Patel stressed that the purpose of the agreement was to improve the UK asylum system in the face of “real humanitarian crises and the plundering of evil people by using this system for their own gain”.
When asked by a reporter what the criteria for relocation were, Patel said, “We are very clear that all those who enter the UK illegally will be resettled and brought to Rwanda. I am not going to release specific criteria for a number. Reasons.”
Rwandan Foreign Minister Vincent Bruda said Rwanda was pleased to work with the United Kingdom.
When asked if Rwanda has the infrastructure, Bruta said the country has the potential to receive immigrants and will invest in new infrastructure to educate and stay immigrants with UK support.
He added that the scheme was only for asylum seekers in the UK and those in the UK and that they “do not want to get people from immediate neighbors like DRC, Burundi, Uganda, Tanzania”.
‘Trade as commodities’
The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) expressed “strong opposition and concerns” about the plan and urged both countries to reconsider.
“People fleeing war, conflict and persecution deserve compassion and sympathy. They should not be traded as goods and transferred overseas for processing,” said UNHCR Assistant High Commissioner for Defense Gillian Trix in a statement.
UNHCR is adamantly opposed to any attempt to transfer refugees and asylum seekers to third countries in the absence of adequate protections and standards. Such arrangements simply shift asylum responsibilities, avoid international obligations, and are contrary to the writing and attitude of refugees. Conference, “said Trix.
The UNHCR also said the plan would increase risks and put more pressure on front-line states as refugees seek alternative routes.
“Experience has shown that these agreements are generally eye-catching and often in violation of international law. Thursday.
“Rwanda’s horrific human rights record is well documented,” it said.
“It directly raises its concerns about human rights abuses in Rwanda, targeting illegal killings, suspicious deaths, illegal or arbitrary detention, torture and misdemeanors, especially critics and protesters. It also provides refuge for Rwandans who fled the country, including four last year.” It added that “while the people of England have opened their hearts and homes to the Ukrainians, the government has chosen to act brutally. Tear off their duties to others who have escaped war and persecution.”
Steve Waltz-Symonds, Amnesty International’s director of refugee and immigration rights in the UK, described the plan as a “shocking misconception”.
As part of the new plan, Johnson said, the British Royal Navy would take over the Border Force’s operational command on the English Channel “with the intention that no boat would go undetected to England.”
It allows UK authorities to say that anyone who drives a boat can be sentenced to life imprisonment.
The English Channel, a narrow waterway between Britain and France, is one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world. Refugees and migrants fleeing conflict, persecution and poverty in poorer or war-torn countries of the world face the dangerous risk of crossing the border, often in dinghyes unfit for travel and at the mercy of human traffickers in the hope of seeking asylum or economic opportunities in the UK.
CNN’s Cara Fox and Helen Reagan contributed to the report.
“Total coffee maven. Extreme web geek. Award-winning explorer. Travel aficionado.”